VWXYNot?: Reasons Not to Believe - Part 1
I have read many (most?) articles written to support Creationism or Intelligent Design and the logic is flawed, or just wrong. I have not taken the time to validate reference material or verified quoted material on ID sites, mostly because it was difficult or impossible to determine the original source material.
This article is a gem - the author of the source material states that her research was taken out of context and the results incorrectly interpreted by reason.org (Reasons To Believe, RTB, or more correctly, Reasons Not To Believe).
Her article is a good read, and she posted a detailed article here. It's a good read, and I read it twice to really understand all her points. I particularly enjoyed the part about her 'favorite' ERV which links us to primates and has been around for 25-30 million years. Sort of a double whammy for the ID folks.

