11.30.2004

When Black Friday Comes

We had a nice Thanksgiving, but I'm determined to not gain weight between now and New Years.

A client has a down circuit. They are a small bank and they need to get online ASAP to post transactions. The data vendor says the circuit is good. They reset the router and the blinky lights are blinking, but the connection is still down.

11.27.2004

FW: Ken Jennings' final episode

My TiVo is ready and waiting.  Even Megan is calling Jeopardy "The Ken Jennings Show".


From: kottke.org
Posted At: Friday, November 26, 2004 10:10 AM
Posted To: kottke.org
Conversation: Ken Jennings' final episode
Subject: Ken Jennings' final episode

Set your TiVos and VCRs...it looks like Ken Jennings will finally lose on Jeopardy on Tuesday, November 30. His 72nd appearance aired yesterday (he won another $50,000), the 73rd will be today, and his final win will come on Monday. As reported here back in September, Jennings loses his 75th game after winning $2.5 million. No one from the show has confirmed this, so it may be wrong**, but we'll...

Lycos screensaver to blitz spam servers

Lycos screensaver to blitz spam servers | The Register



Its a beautiful thing. Lycos is striking back at the SPAMMERS. One way is to remove the financial incentive from SPAM. Most hosted web sites have bandwidth limits. After a certain point, you pay a premium for bandwidth used. Sometimes this premium can be big bucks.

The Lycos screen saver sends requests to documented SPAMMER web sites, driving up the costs for hosting.

I have this installed on my primary workstation as a test. It looks OK and after scanning with the latest version of AdAware. Next, I'm loading it on the family workstations (all five) and my servers (which run 24x7).

Let's put our bandwidth to good use!

You can download from the site makelovenotspam.com. I clicked for the UK link and its running fine on my box.

Let me know what you think!

11.26.2004

Textbook disclaimer stickers

Textbook disclaimer stickers

At first I was upset, because I think incorporation of creationism in any form into science at any level is a giant step backwards, HOWEVER, as I read the disclaimers, I enjoyed them more and more.

Here is a PDF so you can print them out and paste them into your kids textbooks.

11.25.2004

GIANTmicrobes!

Welcome to GIANTmicrobes!

This was actually in the latest WIRED Magazine, but Barb and I were paging through deciding on who is most like each disease or malady.

Happy Thanksgiving

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone.

We will have a small dinner tonight. Sarah is in Atlanta at Georgia Institute of Technology. Mike, Dennis and families are in Ohio. Pauline is working, but Kevin is coming to our house. Brendan is coming, but not staying for dinner. Our Mom's are coming and Katie and Meg will be here. We often have twelve or more people for dinner, so the only up site this year is leftover turkey!

Hope you all have a nice holiday.



11.22.2004

paper cd case

paper cd case

This is an interesting idea - locate the CD/Album title by artist or title, generate a PDF and generate a sheet with fold marks, graphics and tracks. You fold it, slip in your CD and your off and running.

Just the thing for the kids (or your) CD's where the case is missing or torn up. You could even cut the sheet up and insert it into a spare CD case as a replacement for the original.

An example of Frank Zappa's Apostrophe is here:

ZappaCDCover.pdf

11.19.2004

s Moleskine 2005 Pocket Daily Diary

Moleskine 2005 Pocket Daily Diary / Planner, MoleskineUS

Moleskine 2005 Diary. I'm polling my children, godchildren, neices and nephews to prod them into keeping a diary. With all the electronic communications we have these days, I think we overlook the value of written documents and how we will retain data for 50-75 years.

Its 25 years since I attended Georgia Tech. My daughter is now attending Tech and maybe I'm just nostalgic, but I have letters my grandmother sent to me while I was in school. I also wrote over 100 letters the first term I was in college (postage was $.10 for first class mail, too).

What will our kids have to document thier first year in college? I think they have important things to say and a diary is one way to record them for posterity.

11.16.2004

Senate May Ram Copyright Bill

Wired News: Senate May Ram Copyright Bill

This is a big problem. the Intellectual Property Protection Act is several bills cobbled together by the recording industry that is another step toward eliminating consumers "fair use" of copyrighted material.

In particular, I'm upset that it allows consumers to

"permit people to use technology to skip objectionable content -- like a gory or sexually explicit scene -- in films, a right that consumers already have. However, under the proposed law, skipping any commercials or promotional announcements would be prohibited."

What's up with this? Well, under Fair Use, which is an existing law and right, we can skip anything we want - objectionable material, commercials, anything. They are eliminating our right to skip commercials and the wording indicates that the bill is GRANTING us the right to skip objectionable material.

11.15.2004

Has TiVo Forsaken Us?

Interesting article from Dave Farber's IP (Intelligent People) mailing list.


From: Seth David Schoen <schoen@loyalty.org>
Date: November 14, 2004 12:21:08 PM EST
To: David Farber <dave@farber.net>
Subject: Re: [IP] Has TiVo Forsaken Us?

David Farber writes:

> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
> Date: November 13, 2004 12:53:05 AM EST
> To: undisclosed-recipient:;
> Subject: Has TiVo Forsaken Us?
>
> Has TiVo Forsaken Us?
>
> Wired Magazine
> November 2004
>
> Buy a TiVo lately? Sometime in the next few months, your machine will
> quietly download a patch that makes it respond to a new copy
> protection scheme from software maker Macrovision. The app puts
> restrictions on how long your DVR can save certain kinds of shows -
> so far, just pay-per-view and video-on-demand programs. It's the
> first time your TiVo won't let you watch whatever you want, whenever
> you want. We asked TiVo general counsel Matthew Zinn why he thinks
> Hollywood will settle for an inch when it can take a mile.
>
> ...
>
> http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.11/view.html?pg=3

Until about a year ago there was a nice bright-line rule between
unencrypted stuff like free-to-air broadcasting and basic-tier
cable: open standards and no license required to receive them,
therefore no legal restrictions on what you can do with them.  (You
are still bound by copyright law, but the legal default for
unencrypted signals has been that technology is not required to
enforce anyone's notion of copyright.)

Some programming is encrypted on cable and on satellites.  Cable
and satellite companies nowadays supply proprietary set-top boxes
and/or smart cards to let you receive these -- a quintessential
"access control" used to make sure you pay for certain services.
If you don't pay, your access is turned off.  (There are many
different key management approaches to this.)  In the 1996
Telecommunications Act, Congress said that at least the cable
companies ought to standardize their smart card interface format
to promote competition over equipment by allowing third parties
to produce set-top boxes (or to allow people to produce TVs with
integrated "navigation" and a smart card slot).  This policy goal
is called "commercial availability of navigation devices".  But
the cable industry people went off and created a scheme under the
Telecommunications Act framework that would result in _re-encrypting_
the signals within your house.  In other words, the smart cards
and set-top boxes would decrypt the programming as it came into
your house and verify that you were authorized to receive it.  But
then they would encrypt it again in order to enforce _copyright
holder_ policies about what you could do with it after you had
received it.  That re-encryption makes the new generation of pay
TV services (after you've paid for them) different from free TV
services because the pay TV services can be subject to additional
controls after the point of lawful reception.

The FCC was asked to ban this re-encryption -- in a sense, to limit
the use of encryption under the 1996 Act to making sure that you
initially pay for pay TV, not to controlling what you do with it
afterward.  In a decision in 2000, the Commission declined to do
this (it accepted the cable industry's rules with re-encryption in
them as a valid implementation of the "commercial availability of
navigation devices").

This decision was unfortunate in its implications because it vastly
increased the potential leverage that movie studios would have over
technology companies.  If the FCC had forbidden re-encryption of
pay TV programming, companies like TiVo would not need to negotiate
with movie studios (or broadcast groups) in order to get lawful access
to pay TV.  That would be a more aggressively pro-competitive policy
than the policy that the FCC ultimately found Congress intended to
adopt.  Instead, companies like TiVo _do_ have to negotiation for
lawful access to encrypted pay TV.

And TiVo has chosen to do exactly that.  While they started out with
a product that received only unencrypted signals, they have had a lot
of success in grooming themselves for negotiation with, and in
actually negotiating with, copyright and broadcast interests.  The
result is that TiVo can access lots of encrypted pay TV services, some
pay TV providers have become commercial partners of TiVo's, and TiVos
can legally record a lot more TV content.

Of course, that negotiation has come at a corresponding cost: TiVo
implements digital rights management, takes steps (to date not very
strong steps) to control reverse engineering and aftermark
modifications, and generally implements a lot of restrictions on
recorded programming.  TiVo often omits potentially controversial
features or implements them in more restrictive ways than some of
its engineers might have chosen.  And in order to keep other industries
happy, TiVo applies many of these restrictions _to unencrypted TV
programming_, where it is not at all legally required to do so.

TiVo customers are obviously happy enough with this strategy that they
keep buying TiVos in large numbers, although there is a devoted
community of "TiVo hacking" enthusiasts who learn how to add
functionality to their TiVos -- and they have a very complicated
relationship with these restrictions.

The upshot of all this is that, when you buy a TiVo, it is missing
features _with respect to unencrypted TV_ that it could have had under
the law.  And, as the present article shows, TiVo has the ability to
disable more features if its commercial partners ask (or demand under
the terms of a contract) that they be removed.  It can even do this
via field upgrades.

The FCC seems unlikely to reverse its 2000 decision on the commercial
availability of navigation devices -- even though such actions would
give companies like TiVo a much better position, and perhaps a much
more functional product, by removing some of the legal incentives to
appease so many other industries.  Instead, the FCC has actually
headed in the direction of giving movie studios _more_ legal control
over the technology people use to receive television.  (More on this
in a moment.)

There is an alternative -- if you only want to receive unencrypted
TV (free-to-air terrestrial broadcasting and basic-tier cable in
the U.S., and possibly these plus certain types of pay TV in Europe).
You can use a personal computer as a PVR by putting one or more TV
cards inside.  Then you can run software that turns the PC into a PVR.
One of the most impressive programs along these lines is an open
source package called MythTV

http://www.mythtv.org/

which has already implemented functionality competitive with TiVo's
PVR functionality, plus features that TiVo won't touch.  As I described
it the other day:

    IR remote control, program guide data, scheduled and recurring
    recordings, WWW interface, themes and plugins, network streaming,
    multiple tuners (as many as you can fit in a PC) and concurrent
    recording of multiple channels using available tuners, NTSC/ATSC,
    background transcoding, previews and picture-in-picture, ripping
    and archiving, commercial detection, and the traditional abilities
    to rewind and pause live TV.

    Of course, all recordings are unencrypted and can be exported,
    streamed, or burned to removable media.  And the entire project is
    100% open source and actively encourages hacking and third-party
    development.

There is a problem to which I alluded earlier.  The major movie
studios have persuaded the FCC to change the rules for unencrypted
digital television to apply DRM there, in the "broadcast flag" or
"digital broadcast content protection" proceeding.  (That's why I
say that the FCC is unlikely to change the DRM requirement for
cable TV!)  The result is that the equipment that makes a program
like MythTV work with U.S. digital television will be illegal to
manufacture here from July 1, 2005.  If you want to use something
like MythTV for digital TV in the future, your best bet is to buy
the equipment before then.  MythTV works well with the pcHDTV
HD-3000 card, which is finally shipping:

http://www.pchdtv.com/

There is also a MacOS X package (not open source although I'm hoping
because I hear there have been interesting discussions) with an
external tuner -- that will also be illegal to manufacture from
July 1, 2005 -- with an interface described as more polished than
MythTV's although less PVR-like.  Like MythTV, it records to
unencrypted files on your hard drive.

http://www.elgato.com/

(They also have a comprehensive line of products for the European
market, which has its own set of looming legal problems.  It may be
just as advisable for Europeans to buy such equipment in a hurry as
it is for Americans to do so.)

For a bit more advocacy and background information on the broadcast
flag rule and using personal computers as PVRs, see

http://www.eff.org/broadcastflag/

I would not get so worked up about any one action that TiVo takes.
We know their strategy, and it involves co-operating with movie
studios to impose restrictions on end users.  The reasons why they
do this are not mysterious.  If you want to criticize TiVo -- and
that's fine with me! -- the right place to start is much earlier in
the company's history.

But if you actually want to opt out of the DRM game, it seems to
me that the thing to do is to spread the remaining unrestricted
technologies as far and wide as possible while they're still legal.

People who got excited about "convergence" last decade often didn't
mention DRM (and sometimes weren't even aware of it).  Today MythTV
describes itself as "the ultimate convergence box" -- like several
other products, it brings TV into the PC environment _on the PC's
terms_.  Programmable, extensible, subject to third-party innovation.
I have seen this running and found it simply incredible.  But because
of the legal and commercial incentives, this isn't where _most_ of
the industry is going today.

I've often thought of writing an essay called "converging up,
converging down?" about the ambiguity of the "convergence" ideal.
PCs and consumer electronics (CE) devices have very different
characteristics -- beyond just the technical differences, veering
into cultural differences -- even though today they are usually
made out of the same chips.  Among other things, PCs in the past
were friendlier to user innovation and third party innovation; you
could teach them to do more.  CE devices in the past were much more
single-function and fixed-function, and upgrades (if available)
typically had to be provided by the manufacturer.  Ultimately PCs
were much more under end user control and CE devices much more
under the manuacturer's control.  Movie studios have appreciated
this distinction; they have better, older, and closer relationships
with the CE industries than with the PC industries.

(On the negative side, PCs are seen as more expensive and more
difficult to use than CE devices.  CE devices have enjoyed wider
and faster market penetration.  To some people, the CE device is
the ideal in terms of user interface even if it's not the ideal
in other ways.)

If these device families actually do "converge", on whose terms
will they converge?  Will the PC grow more like a DVD player (or
a TiVo), or will the PVR and cell phone grow more like PCs?  And,
since "being like a PC" or "being like a CE box" is not just a
single dimension, in _which ways_ will they become more like one
another?  Which particular characteristics will each now imitate?
(For example, many CE devices today do have a CPU, RAM, and
operating system, and do run software, as in a PC -- but it's not
software chosen or loaded by the owner of the device!  The same
is true of many cell phones and other mobile devices.)

In terms of end user control, there is an opportunity for CE devices
to converge up (enhancing customers' control) and a risk of PC
devices converging down (eroding it).  I think the world the
entertainment companies have built is providing exactly the wrong
incentive at every point as this question is worked out.

--
Seth David Schoen <schoen@loyalty.org> | Very frankly, I am opposed to
people
      http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/   | being programmed by others.
      http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/     |     -- Fred Rogers (1928-2003),
                                        |        464 U.S. 417, 445 (1984)

11.12.2004

Automobile/Motorcar Photography Tips by Curt Scott

Automobile/Motorcar Photography Tips by Curt Scott

Great photography tips with a focus (pardon pun) on digital photography.

11.11.2004

Exchange Edition--The Pitfalls of Antivirus Solutions--November 11, 2004

Good article that summarizes AV problems with Exchange.

Paul Robichaux adds some details regarding the type of error you receive if
various Exchange components (EDB, STM, checkpoint/transaction log files) get
quarrantined by your file system anti-virus product.


==== 1. Commentary: The Pitfalls of Antivirus Solutions ====
by Paul Robichaux, Exchange Editor, exadmin@windowsitpro.com

Antivirus solutions are an important part of most business networks. The
criminals who write and release viruses are increasingly prolific and clever
at distributing their "products." Their industriousness and skill argues in
favor of keeping antivirus scanners at your network perimeter, on your
desktop machines, and on your Exchange Server systems. However, the cure
might sometimes be worse than the disease. I've noticed a worrisome trend:
Many Exchange administrators are having trouble with their server-based
antivirus products, usually because of two simple problems that can easily
be corrected.
The first problem is that in some cases, antivirus scanners cause email
to stop flowing to users. The precise cause of this problem can be difficult
to isolate, but the symptoms are unmistakable: Users stop getting new email
from the outside world. Stopping and restarting the scanning service will
sometimes resolve the problem. Depending on the antivirus product you use,
you might be able to use its management tool to pinpoint the problem, or you
can use Exchange System Manager's
(ESM's) queue-viewing tools to determine whether mail from particular
origins is arriving at your Exchange servers normally. You'll probably find
that the problem is caused by your antivirus software's failure to keep up
under load, or by its behavior when it encounters a particular type of
malformed (or poorly formed) message. If disabling the antivirus service
solves the problem or if you can localize the problem to a single message,
you've found an extremely valuable clue as to the cause of the issue. Also,
stoppage might be because your perimeter SMTP scanner has stopped accepting
mail or has fallen behind in its scanning. Exchange-aware scanners that use
the Virus Scanning API (VSAPI--see "You Had Me At EHLO" at
http://blogs.msdn.com/exchange/archive/2004/10/20/245157.aspx for a
description) typically perform on-demand scans that aren't subject to this
problem.
The second problem is both more serious and easier to avoid. For years,
the understood best practice has been to avoid running file-level antivirus
scanners on Exchange servers. Why? Because those scanners look at patterns
of data within individual files, quarantining or "cleaning" files that
contain patterns that match virus signatures. Guess what happens if your
scanner quarantines an Exchange database file? Nothing good, that's for
sure:
- If the EDB or STM file is quarantined, Exchange won't be able to mount
the Store. If the file is quarantined while still opened by Exchange, the
results are unpredictable but will frequently include
-1018 errors. The Microsoft article "Error events are logged when the
Exchange Server database service is denied write access to its own .edb
files or to the .chk file"
( http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=253111 ) provides details about this
particular type of misbehavior.
- If a transaction log file is quarantined, Exchange will notice the
missing file when you next try to mount that Store, and the database won't
mount.
- If the checkpoint log file is quarantined, the database won't be
mountable, and you might notice other problems (including -1811 errors). The
Microsoft articles "Error events are logged when the Exchange Server
database service is denied write access to its own .edb files or to the .chk
file" and "XADM: Database Won't Start; Circular Logging Deleted Log File Too
Soon"
( http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=176239 ) describe typical results of
this situation.

If you run into one of these situations, your only option to get the file
back is to release it from quarantine, restore it from a backup, or recreate
the database by playing back your log files.
Microsoft recommends against using file-level scanners on Exchange
databases, log files, Message Transfer Agent (MTA) files, and SMTP queues
(see the Microsoft articles "Overview of Exchange Server 2003 and antivirus
software" at http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=823166
or "Exchange and antivirus software" at
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=328841 ). Many experienced administrators
know this advice, but more than a few do not. As part of your job-security
program, please make sure the folks you work with are in the former
category.
One last note about virus cleaning: Don't assume that an infected machine
is OK just because you used an antivirus tool to clean it.
Such cleaning can get rid of simple infections such as those caused by
Blaster, but sophisticated malware can pass through cleaning. Serious
infections might require you to flatten and rebuild the machine.



11.09.2004

Attempts at overthrowing the teaching of evolution gathering steam

This was posted to Farber's IP mailing list today.
Personally, I am very concerned about "Intelligent Design" (Creationism) creeping into the classroom with Bush's perceived Political Capital.

More to follow.



Begin forwarded message:

From: "Robert J. Berger"
Date: November 8, 2004 2:32:35 PM EST
To: Dewayne Hendricks , Dave Farber
Subject: Attempts at overthrowing the teaching of evolution gathering steam

The Christian Fundamentalists are hard at work at making the US on par with Islamic fundamentalist states. First step, have their religion taught in schools. Cases in Georgia and Wisconsin are the first points of legal attack. All they need is get Bush to appoint some more fundamentalist judges and there will may be no stopping them.

-----------

Evolution case opens in Georgia court

By Kristen Wyatt
http://www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2004/11/08/evolution/print.html

Nov. 8, 2004  |  ATLANTA (AP) -- A warning sticker in suburban Atlanta science textbooks that says evolution is "a theory, not a fact" was challenged in court Monday as an unlawful promotion of religion.

The disclaimer was adopted by Cobb County school officials in
2002 after hundreds of parents signed a petition criticizing the textbooks for treating evolution as fact without discussing alternate theories, including creationism.

"The religious views of some that contradict science cannot dictate curriculum," American Civil Liberties Union attorney Maggie Garrett argued Monday before U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper. The trial is expected to last several days.

But a lawyer for Cobb County schools, Linwood Gunn, held up a copy of a textbook's table of contents Monday that showed dozens of pages about evolution.

"The sticker doesn't exist independently of the 101 pages about evolution," Gunn said. "This case is not about a sticker which has 33 words on it. ... It's about textbooks that say a lot more than that."

The stickers read: "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."

One of the parents who filed the lawsuit, Jeffrey Selman, said the stickers discredit the science of evolution.

"It's like saying everything that follows this sticker isn't true," he said.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1987 that creationism was a religious belief that could not be taught in public schools along with evolution.

Gunn said he expects the warning will hold up in court, saying it "provides a unique opportunity for critical thinking."

"It doesn't say anything about faith," Gunn said. "It doesn't say anything about religion."


And:

Wisconsin district to teach more than evolution

http://www.cnn.com/2004/EDUCATION/11/06/evolution.schools.ap/


GRANTSBURG, Wisconsin (AP) -- School officials have revised the science curriculum to allow the teaching of creationism, prompting an outcry from more than 300 educators who urged that the decision be reversed.

Members of Grantsburg's school board believed that a state law governing the teaching of evolution was too restrictive. The science curriculum "should not be totally inclusive of just one scientific theory," said Joni Burgin, superintendent of the district of 1,000 students in northwest Wisconsin.

Last month, when the board examined its science curriculum, language was added calling for "various models/theories" of origin to be incorporated.

The decision provoked more than 300 biology and religious studies faculty members to write a letter last week urging the Grantsburg board to reverse the policy. It follows a letter sent previously by 43 deans at Wisconsin public universities.

"Insisting that teachers teach alternative theories of origin in biology classes takes time away from real learning, confuses some students and is a misuse of limited class time and public funds," said Don Waller, a botanist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Wisconsin law mandates that evolution be taught, but school districts are free to create their own curricular standards, said Joe Donovan, a spokesman for the state Department of Public Instruction.

There have been scattered efforts around the nation for other school boards to adopt similar measures. Last month the Dover Area School Board in Pennsylvania voted to require the teaching of alternative theories to evolution, including "intelligent design" -- the idea that life is too complex to have developed without a creator.

The state education board in Kansas was heavily criticized in
1999 when it deleted most references to evolution. The decision was reversed in 2001.

In March, the Ohio Board of Education narrowly approved a lesson plan that some critics contended opens the door to teaching creationism.

--
Robert J. Berger - Internet Bandwidth Development, LLC.
Voice: 408-882-4755 eFax: +1-408-490-2868 http://www.ibd.com


11.06.2004

RE: Office: 100 tips and tricks


This appears to be a very useful article.
The link for Part 1 is: http://www.vnunet.com/features/1159130

________________________________

From: Bink.nu [mailto:bink@bink.nu]
Posted At: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 8:46 AM Posted To: Bink.nu
Conversation: Office: 100 tips and tricks
Subject: Office: 100 tips and tricks



http://bink.nu/?ArticleID=2808

Most of us use Microsoft Office, but do we know how to make the most of it?
VNUNET reveal 100 top tips for mastering this suite.part 1part 2


11.04.2004

IPac - A PAC for balanced intellectual property policy

IPac - A PAC for balanced intellectual property policy

This is a good start. Our Fair Use rights have been significantly eroded under the Bush Administration. I really don't care what agenda Bush wants to push over the next four years, I for one am putting all my elected representatives on notice that our IP (intellectual property) rights need to be restored and Washington needs to get a clue about technology.

Engineers are not going to sit on the sidelines and have things jammed down our collective throats any more.

IPac is a nonpartisan group dedicated to preserving individual freedom through balanced intellectual property policy.

We believe that technological innovation and individual creativity are vital to the future of this country. We believe that a prosperous and democratic society depends on freedom for all individuals to pursue scientific invention and artistic expression. Unfortunately, new intellectual property laws threaten to stifle these freedoms and restrict public participation in science, art, and political discourse

Election 2004 Results

Election 2004 Results

Very interesting analysis by Robert J. Vanderbei, an Ops Research professor at Princeton.

Using County-by-County election return data from USA Today together with County boundary data from the US Census' Tiger database we produced the following graphic depicting the results. Of course, blue is for the democrats, red is for the republicans, and green is for all other. Each county's color is a mix of these three color components in proportion to the results for that county.

11.03.2004

State Voting Summary by IQ

Untitled Document

This explains a lot about the election. It scares me, too.

11.02.2004

Endorsements in the Nov. 2 General Election

Philly.com

This is a list of the Philadelphia Inquirer endorsements for the 2004 General Election for the South Jersey and Philadelphia region.

FW: Robots.text At Whitehouse.gov

Very interesting reading - the whitehouse robots.txt file.
This is a text file that prevents robots (web search sites use spiders or 'bots' to crawl web sites and index information).  More info at www.robotstxt.org.


From: J-Walk Blog
Posted At: Friday, October 29, 2004 12:16 PM
Posted To: J-Walk Blog
Conversation: Robots.text At Whitehouse.gov
Subject: Robots.text At Whitehouse.gov

From The Inquirer: White House site has oddities, like Bush site.

According to Internet consultant Dave Bender, from Minnesota, Bush's web team have done some strange things to the White House web site (www.whitehouse.gov). It has apparently been configured to prevent Internet search engines from capturing historic snapshots of what is posted on the site.

The technical details are in a file that web sites often have in their uppermost directory called 'robots.txt'. It contains directives that Internet search engines, like Google and Yahoo, read to determine what the site owner would like indexed by the search engine.

Here's a link the the robots.txt file at whitehouse.gov. It's a list of all the directories that they don't want indexed by search engines.

Why so many?

He said that the only reason he could thing of is that it is designed to prevent a plugged-in reporter could check a page on a site and compare it with the cached version to see what's changed.

A concerned voter might want to see if the White House has changed its position on one thing or another.

11.01.2004

FW: Introduction to Active DirectoryR to ADAM Synchronizer

Just what the doctor ordered.
I'm testing directory synch with MIIS 2003 and ADAM this week.


From: Microsoft Download Center
Posted At: Thursday, October 28, 2004 7:09 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Download Center
Conversation: Introduction to Active Directory® to ADAM Synchronizer
Subject: Introduction to Active Directory® to ADAM Synchronizer

Compares Active Directory to ADAM Synchronizer with other existing synchronization technologies and shows why Active Directory to ADAM Synchronizer is the better option for certain scenarios. Also describes usage scenarios for Active Directory to ADAM Synchronizer, and describes the benefits of using this new ADAM feature.

Kerry over Bush?

Electoral Vote poll site is getting hammered by slashdot.org and tons of other linkers.

The summery is Kerry over Bush 283 to 246. I think both sides are very nervous over the outcome. I think there were 'issues' with the facts on both sides, but the Republicans were far more negative and in many cases just fabricated facts. Even when they got caught, the just apologized and carried on.

Attack ads running in our region (Philadelphia/South Jersey/Delaware) by the RNC were linking MoveOn.org with 'rape of women and children'. Its pretty amazing, because I have followed (and supported moveon.org since its inception).